Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the XML-Loy CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 101268
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: XML-Loy

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: 0.31
Fixed in: 0.32



Subject: t/set.t test started to fail (maybe with Mojolicious 5.71?)
Currently t/set.t fails like this: # Failed test 'Serial once att' # at t/set.t line 26. # got: undef # expected: '' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 40. t/set.t .................................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/40 subtests It could be because of Mojolicious 5.71 (5.70 seems to be fine). More information will be available once the calculation at http://analysis.cpantesters.org/solved?distv=XML-Loy-0.31 is finished... Regards, Slaven
On 2015-01-03 08:05:10, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> Currently t/set.t fails like this: > > # Failed test 'Serial once att' > # at t/set.t line 26. > # got: undef > # expected: '' > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 40. > t/set.t .................................. > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > Failed 1/40 subtests > > It could be because of Mojolicious 5.71 (5.70 seems to be fine). More > information will be available once the calculation at > http://analysis.cpantesters.org/solved?distv=XML-Loy-0.31 is > finished...
A sample fail report: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/30039496-926a-11e4-87e4-de3106a2f088
Thank you for reporting this! I already saw the problem on cpantesters but wanted to wait for some more results. However - I hope this is now fixed in 0.32! Am Sa 03. Jan 2015, 08:08:41, SREZIC schrieb: Show quoted text
> On 2015-01-03 08:05:10, SREZIC wrote:
> > Currently t/set.t fails like this: > > > > # Failed test 'Serial once att' > > # at t/set.t line 26. > > # got: undef > > # expected: '' > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 40. > > t/set.t .................................. > > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > > Failed 1/40 subtests > > > > It could be because of Mojolicious 5.71 (5.70 seems to be fine). More > > information will be available once the calculation at > > http://analysis.cpantesters.org/solved?distv=XML-Loy-0.31 is > > finished...
> > A sample fail report: > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/30039496-926a-11e4-87e4-de3106a2f088
Yes, looks good now. On 2015-01-03 14:17:24, AKRON wrote: Show quoted text
> Thank you for reporting this! > I already saw the problem on cpantesters but wanted to wait for some > more results. However - I hope this is now fixed in 0.32! > > Am Sa 03. Jan 2015, 08:08:41, SREZIC schrieb:
> > On 2015-01-03 08:05:10, SREZIC wrote:
> > > Currently t/set.t fails like this: > > > > > > # Failed test 'Serial once att' > > > # at t/set.t line 26. > > > # got: undef > > > # expected: '' > > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 40. > > > t/set.t .................................. > > > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > > > Failed 1/40 subtests > > > > > > It could be because of Mojolicious 5.71 (5.70 seems to be fine). > > > More > > > information will be available once the calculation at > > > http://analysis.cpantesters.org/solved?distv=XML-Loy-0.31 is > > > finished...
> > > > A sample fail report: > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/30039496-926a-11e4-87e4- > > de3106a2f088